Summaries cite their sources
A session summary is AI-drafted from confirmed evidence, but it records exactly which pieces of evidence it came from - a summary that cannot point back to its sources cannot be cited later.
Platform
Built to be read later.
Staff leave. Consultants finish their contracts. Governments change. What a decision rested on should not leave with any of them.
What keeps a record trustworthy years later
History is kept, not overwritten
A superseded decision keeps pointing at what replaced it. A reversed one keeps its reversal reason. Correcting a transcript keeps the model's original output alongside the human edit - neither version is lost.
Consent decisions are never edited
Amending what someone consented to creates a new, versioned record and marks the old one superseded - it does not rewrite it. What a participant actually agreed to at the time stays exactly as captured, permanently.
Built for the people who were not there
A record that only makes sense to the person who wrote it is not institutional memory - it is a personal note. Every record here assumes its reader is a future stranger: a new hire, a successor, an auditor, a court.
Clarity now is kindness then.